AFIDA WATCH · HIDALGO COUNTY

Revenue lost to abatement for county use in one form or another

County taxes only · Review simulation · October 28, 2026

SELECTED COUNTY AGREEMENT ESTIMATE
Awaiting selection
SELECTED SCENARIO AMOUNT
Awaiting selection
ALLOCATED TO COUNTY USES
Awaiting selection
UNALLOCATED BALANCE
Awaiting selection
COUNTY CHAPTER 312

COUNTY AGREEMENT & EVIDENCE

Verified annual actual: not established for the selected dossier. Countywide total: not calculated; shared agreements are not added together.

REVENUE AVAILABLE IN THIS SCENARIO

POTENTIAL APPLICATION TO COUNTY SERVICES

Adjust the percentages. Defaults illustrate a possible allocation; they are not the county’s adopted budget.

Public safety includes county sheriff and county-funded emergency services. Municipal police and fire payrolls require their own city accounts.

HYPOTHETICAL COUNTY USE

Dollar allocations only. No employee counts, raises or construction quantities are asserted without verified costs.

WHAT THE SIMULATION ASSUMES

It assumes the same project exists, with the same taxable property, and pays the affected county taxes without the incentive. It does not establish that the project would have been built on those terms.

“Revenue lost to abatement” refers to county taxes forgone relative to that scenario. A documented contract estimate is not proof that the estimated amount has already been abated or would all become unrestricted spending capacity. Annual values, tax rates, fund restrictions, amendments and actual collections must be reconciled.